Under the GeoMIP project, several experiments projected future climate change, based on various greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions trajectories, and others projected solar radiation modification (SRM) techniques like stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI). Our efforts focus on two scenarios:
By comparing a world of high levels of GHG emissions (and higher climate impacts/risk) against a world of SRM, scientists, policy makers and civil society will be in a better position to judge the potential suitability of SRM technologies within the global climate response portfolio. This is referred to as risk-risk framing. Simply put, comparing the risks of worsening climate change against the risks of ill-understood SRM deployment when making decisions about resource allocation.
Although climate models have become more sophisticated and accurate as more investment in their development has occurred from various government and academic/research institutions, they still contain a degree of uncertainty when it comes to their simulations and projections. An MMEM in climate modeling is the average output generated from multiple climate models that simulate the same scenario. Instead of relying on a single model, multiple models are used to predict future climate conditions, and the results are averaged to produce a more robust and reliable forecast. Each model in the ensemble can have different strengths and weaknesses due to differences in how they represent climate processes, such as atmospheric dynamics, cloud formation, or ocean-atmosphere interactions.
Here we present an MMEM of malaria incidence rate for South Asian countries for both the climate change scenario (SSP5-8.5) and the SRM scenario (G6sulfur).